Monday, March 19, 2018

WHY SOCIAL SECURITY MAY IGNORE YOUR DOCTOR'S OPINION ON DISABILITY

You have a Social Security hearing coming up on your disability claim.  You approach your doctor about filling out a form to support your claim.  The doctor is busy but offers to give you a letter, instead.  Here's an example of a doctor's letter:

"Mr. Joe Claimant has been a patient of mine for over 20 years.  He suffers from back pain, migraine headaches, high cholesterol, high blood pressure and depression.  In my opinion, Mr. Claimant is not able to work and is fully disabled."  Signed [John M. Doctor, MD].

Why Social Security judges will probably ignore this letter?

The letter draws a conclusion that only the Commissioner of Social Security is able to reach, under the law.  (20 CFR 404.1527).

Doctors are not permitted to decide who is disabled under the federal regulations.  The fact that your doctor believes you are disabled is not dispositive.

It would be far better if your doctor specified why you cannot work.  For example, if he provided your restrictions on such activities as sitting, standing, walking, bending, lifting, crawling, kneeling, crouching, paying attention, remembering, etc. Doctors are permitted to assess your individual functional limitations, but not to draw conclusions about whether you are disabled.

There is a form that I like to use for doctors.  It's called a Medical Source Statement.  Some people call it a Residual Functional Capacity form.  It nearly always carries more weight with Social Security decision makers, especially judges, than letters do.  The reason is obvious:  the form keeps doctors away from drawing conclusions and allows them to estimate functional restrictions, according to Social Security regulations.

I will provide this form free to anyone requesting it.
___________
THE FORSYTHE FIRM
Social Security Disability Representatives
7027 Old Madison Pike NW - Suite 108
Huntsville, AL 35806
PHONE (256) 799-0297

https://forsythefirm.wixsite.com/website

Saturday, March 3, 2018

SHOULD YOU HAVE A DISABILITY HEARING BY VIDEO?

Responding to the severe backlog of hearings and the long wait time to get a hearing, Social Security is now doing a large percentage of their disability hearings by Video-Teleconference (VTC). 

But do you really want to have your hearing by VTC?

You have a choice.  You can opt out of video hearings, if you do so according to the rules.  (More on that later).

The major advantage of a video-teleconference is that it shortens the wait time for a hearing.  Obviously, use of VTC gives judges much more flexibility in scheduling, thus may shorten the time you have to wait for a hearing.

What is the approval rate of VTC hearings vs. in-person hearings? Again, my research indicates that in-person hearings result in awards about 5 percent more often than video hearings.  A 5 percent increase may not sound like much, but it is significant.

What if you want to opt out of a VTC and insist on an in-person hearing where the judge is in the same room with you, not on a TV screen?  Here is the rule you must follow:

Social Security will send you a written notice that you they may schedule a hearing for you by Video-Teleconference.  This is normally in a packet of materials sent out a few months after you submit your appeal.  Once you receive this notice, you must object to a VTC in writing within 30 days of the date of notice.  A form is sent with the notice for this purpose.

Need help with a Social Security disability claim or appeal?  Get a free consultations and case evaluation by calling the Forsythe Firm here in Huntsville.  (We work with clients all over Alabama and middle Tennessee).

  THE FORSYTHE FIRM
Practice Limited to Social Security disability 
7027 Old Madison Pike NW - Suite 108
Huntsville, AL 35806
(256) 799-0297

SOCIAL SECURITY JUSTICE - MORE INFORMATION